Showing posts with label TAM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TAM. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 06, 2012

Hong Kong still remembers

While the June 4th anniversary of the Tiananmen crackdown goes largely unremarked on the Chinese mainland, the people of Hong Kong turn out every year in huge numbers for a candelight vigil in Victoria Park (see a report of this year's event in the South China Morning Post). Far from fading in the memory, the public response seems to have been getting stronger in recent years, with Monday's crowd being the biggest ever - organisers estimate that around 180,000 people took part. [Here's a video report on this year's vigil.]

Fang Zheng, one of the most famous victims of the Beijing crackdown (his legs were torn off when he was run down by a tank on Chang'an Avenue, not far from the Party leaders' residences at Zhongnanhai - an incident that Deng Xiaoping always sought to deny), was among those in attendance this year.

There was also an excellent article in The Washington Post yesterday - by He Xiaoqing, a Chinese history lecturer at Harvard who specialises in studies of the Tiananmen crackdown and its aftermath - about the work of Ding Zilin's Tiananmen Mothers group (here's a link to their Chinese website; or you can register your support for their efforts here), which concludes with the observation:

The moment a government orders its army to fire on its own people, it loses its legitimacy; when a regime tells its people that human lives and human rights, human dignity and human decency can be “sacrificed” for the sake of higher goals such as national pride and economic development, it sends the message that any principle can be compromised for the ideals of “get rich” and “rising.” Such mentality has become the root of major social and political problems in the post-Tiananmen China.



[I also just turned up this fine essay from the Tiananmen Mothers, first published a couple of years ago, and still available on the Human Rights in China website. This year's message from the group, also on that site, laments the sorry lack of progress towards acknowledgement and redress of the crimes of June 4th over the last decade, but notes rumours that Wen Jiabao - the only member of the current leadership who seems to be sincerely an advocate of reform - has in the past year again been arguing behind closed doors for such an initiative. In the current climate of insecurity, I can't see him making any progress to that end. Indeed, my gut feeling is that it will probably take another decade or two - if it happens at all. But we must all keep lobbying for it. For me, the issue is not so much about showing respect for the victims and their families, but about whether you can found the future progress of the nation on LIES. The continuing cover-up on Tiananmen is shackling China's development - it has got to STOP one day.]



Spooky!

Reuters reported the other day that the Shanghai Composite Index suffered a drop of 64.89 points on Monday, an uncanny reminiscence of 6.4.89 - the style in which the Chinese usually render the date of their government's brutal suppression of the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.

That this should happen on the 23rd anniversary of the murderous crackdown is an eerily improbable coincidence, although no other explanation seems likely.

Even Fate is seeking to remind the Chinese Communist Party of its crimes, it would seem...


Tuesday, June 05, 2012

New Picks of the Month

What are my latest recommendations from three years ago this month? Well, June 2009 was a slightly slow month for my blogging, since I got particularly emotional about the 20th anniversary of the bloody suppression of the 1989 Tiananmen protest movement, and maintained a week of silence to commemorate and mourn the event. I was also manically busy with apartment-hunting, while preparing to leave the country for an extended holiday at the end of the month (crikey - I haven't been back to the UK in three years?!). 

From Froogville, I'll choose this brief frippery from just prior to my departure, Flu Corner, inspired by an e-mail I received about the avian 'flu panic of the time. 

And on The Barstool I pick The near miss, a depressingly typical tale of romantic frustration.


Monday, June 04, 2012

Bon mot for the week

"Trying to bury the past will only smother your future."


Froog



It's the time for remembrance again, for reflecting on the great tragedy of China's recent history. I say something like this every year. One day the powers-that-be in the Party will take on board this lesson. One day. We have to keep believing that.

Friday, June 01, 2012

Traffic Report - the blog stats for May

Despite being frantically busy with preparations to leave China, I somehow kept up an 'average' - or slightly above 'average' - rate of wittering on the blogs last month.


There were 35 posts and around 16,000 words on Froogville.

There were 33 posts and nearly 10,000 words on Round-The-World Barstool Blues.


The major event of this past month (apart from my departure) has been my campaign to lobby China Central Television to dismiss the despicable Yang Rui. It's unlikely to have much effect, but it's the principle of the thing; we have to keep registering our disapproval of this racist scumbag, and of the fact that the national TV station continues to employ him (with the tacit blessing, if not the direct intervention of the government on Yang's behalf) as one of the lead anchors on its English-language 'International' channel. This is ridiculous, disgusting, utterly intolerable.


My posting, I think, is likely to be much lighter during the next couple of months. Although I have nothing but time on my hands, I am also travelling quite a bit, and not always taking my laptop with me.



I traditionally observe a brief break from blogging anyway at this time of year, to commemorate the victims of the government's June crackdown on the Tiananmen protesters of 1989.  

I'll be back blogging some time next week. 

In this magnificent summer, amid all the holiday revelry of the upcoming weekend, do take a moment or two to reflect on what happened in Beijing 23 years ago - and on how little has really changed since then in the way China is run.


Monday, June 06, 2011

Bon mot for the week

"It is much easier to forget what you remember than to remember what you have forgotten. That is why it is so important always to remember."

Froog



I've just added a link to my ongoing series of posts about the legacy of the 1989 Tiananmen protests to the sidebar over there (down below the links about Ai Weiwei and Wu Yuren), and a separate link to the long piece I wrote two years ago on the twentieth anniversary of the crackdown.


Friday, June 03, 2011

Haiku for the week

Uneven struggle:
Behind barricades they wait,
With bricks against guns.


It's always seemed to me that June 3rd rather than June 4th should be the main focus of commemoration of the 1989 demonstrations in Beijing (and their brutal suppression). Orders to clear Tiananmen Square of protesters had been circulated during the day, and troops began to mobilize in the early evening of the 3rd - leading to a night of rioting across the capital as citizens poured into the streets and improvised scores of roadblocks to try to bar the army's progress into the city centre. The clearing of the Square was not accomplished until the early hours of the morning of the 4th, and sporadic shooting incidents took place in or near the Square - and across much of Beijing - for some time afterwards; but many of the most violent clashes had taken place relatively early on, as the armoured columns  began to move in from the outer suburbs - most notably at Muxidi in west Beijing, where troops fired repeated volleys into a crowd, killing around 200 people.


And sometimes it feels as though we're cowering behind the barricades still; but it's no longer about obstruction and defiance, it's just about hiding for self-preservation; there are mental roadblocks that people erect to prevent themselves from having to confront the truth. There's a lot of fear in this adopted home of mine - fear and apathy and denial.


Today - and tomorrow, this weekend, this week - is a time to reflect on what happened here 22 years ago. And it is a time to hope that it is not yet too late for China's leaders to acknowledge what happened, to apologise for it, to learn from it, to start to heal the wounds - and to pledge that the powers of government here will never be so abused again.

Friday, April 15, 2011

'Tis the season...

For commemoration.

And, perhaps, for a rebirth of the inventive and optimistic spirit of the 1980s here, for an end to repression and the beginnings of reform. One day, perhaps; one day, but not yet a while.



On April 15th, 1989, Hu Yaobang died. 

As General Secretary of the Communist Party in the early 1980s, he'd been the prime architect of Deng Xiaoping's reform programme. However, his liberalizing tendencies went too far for the Party's conservative 'old guard'; he was blamed for an upsurge of volatile student activism in the mid-1980s, and forced out of office at the beginning of 1987. Fellow liberals Zhao Ziyang and Bao Tong took over the reins of power and tried to push ahead with reforms, but Hu lived out the last two years of his life in obscurity, publicly disgraced.

In that time, he became a figurehead, a martyr to the still vigorous campus political groups; and the announcement of his death led immediately to speeches, vigils, and memorials at universities all over Beijing. The next day saw the first of a series of mass meetings, where student leaders issued a call for an official reassessment of his political legacy. On the evenings of the 18th and 19th, crowds of several hundred students demonstrated in front of the gates of the Party headquarters. On the 22nd, an estimated 50,000 students marched through Beijing to Tiananmen Square, to listen to a broadcast of his funeral service taking place in the adjacent Great Hall of the People. It was the beginning of a spontaneous protest movement that would soon evolve into a continuous occupation of the Square by hundreds of thousands of students and workers.  


There are several notable dates over the next seven weeks; but this is where it began.


Friday, June 04, 2010

The weekend poem comes a little early

This poet, Arthur Hugh Clough, was one of the great forward-thinkers of the first half of the 19th Century, indeed something of a proto-socialist. This, his best-known work, is said to have grown from his attempt to find consolation and a renewed sense of purpose amid the bitter disillusion that followed the failure of most of the political reform movements which had erupted into 'The Year Of Revolutions' in Europe in 1848. Change is coming; maybe slower than you'd wanted, maybe imperceptibly, maybe not in the way that you'd imagined; but change is coming; change cannot be stopped.

I'd so like to believe that might be true of China today, but I struggle to find any evidence of it.

It's odd how these widespread political convulsions seem to happen every 60 or 70 years (at least, since the dawn of 'the modern age'): 1642, ????, 1776, 1848, 1917, 1989..... I wonder if it's something to do with the human life-cycle: the typical span of three generations, or the typical life expectancy of a man?

I hope we don't have to wait around past the middle of this century to see things change in the way this country is governed. It should be noted that this 70-year cycle seems to be a succession of violent upheavals. I would like to think that such sudden, and potentially catastrophic, shifts in political arrangements could be avoided - or at least ameliorated - by timely and well-managed programmes of reform. But perhaps not; perhaps there's just something about the way our societies work that things have to fall apart once in every lifetime.



The Struggle

Say not the struggle nought availeth,
The labour and the wounds are vain,
The enemy faints not nor faileth,
And as things have been, things remain;

If hopes were dupes, fears may be liars;
It may be, in yon smoke conceal'd,
Your comrades chase e'en now the fliers—
And, but for you, possess the field.

For while the tired waves vainly breaking
Seem here no painful inch to gain,
Far back, through creeks and inlets making,
Comes silent, flooding in, the main.

And not by eastern windows only,
When daylight comes, comes in the light,
In front the sun climbs slow, how slowly,
But westward, look! the land is bright.


Arthur Hugh Clough (1819-1861)

Haiku for the week

The blood on the streets
Can't be washed away by lies;
Its stench still lingers.


It's amazing, appalling that the government is still trying to cover up what happened here on 3rd/4th June 1989. It remains a truth too terrible to be confronted that 21 years ago the selfish, frightened Party leaders in Zhongnanhai briefly declared war on their own people.

Many of those responsible are still alive, some are still in power. Wise up, guys. The longer you try to keep on denying this, the harder it's going to come back and bite you in the arse one day.


Well, no - sadly, perhaps not. It may take years yet, perhaps decades before we see any such consequences; and by then, the perpetrators may all finally be dead, or safely retired (perhaps retired overseas, at that). I fret that it's the country rather than the guilty old men who lead it that may one day inherit a bloody legacy from these decades of institutional dishonesty. If you try to keep the lid screwed down this tight on all dissent.... eventually it's going to explode like a pressure-cooker.

It would be much better for all concerned if the Party leaders would begin to face these skeletons in their closet NOW. But I fear it's never going to happen.




[Some foreign observers here have made quite a lot of an editorial piece that appeared in the main Party mouthpiece People's Daily a couple of months back, a personal memoir by Premier Wen Jiabao about Hu Yaobang, the reformist former General Secretary of the CCP whose death sparked the 1989 demonstrations. (Hu had been purged from the leadership at the beginning of 1987, when the old guard blamed his liberal policies for earlier outbreaks of student activism over the previous 18 months. He subsequently became idolized as a martyr by many of the students, and tens of thousands gathered on Tiananmen Square to honour his memory on the day of this funeral, 22nd April 1989 - the first of the mass occupations of the Square which continued through the next six weeks, until...) You can read an English translation of that article on the China Geeks blog here. I'm not getting too excited just yet. Perhaps it is one of these very subtle testing-the-waters type of things - Let's run it half-way up the flag-pole, and see if anyone gets arrested. Perhaps it could herald the beginnings of a major shift in official attitudes. But it seems to me that a partial 'rehabilitation' of the long-dead Hu Yaobang is a very long way indeed from a rehabilitation of the much more recently deceased Zhao Ziyang (his successor, who was purged in the midst of the Tiananmen sit-in, for counselling moderation in dealing with the protesters) or of his deputy of the time, Bao Tong (under house arrest ever since; but he continues to be an astute and unrelenting critic of the present regime). And a very, very long way from making an apology, commemorating the dead, allowing public examination and discussion of what really happened. Daring to say that the CCP's 'reformers' of the 1980s were perhaps not all bad after all is some sort of a start; but it's only the tiniest of steps on a very long and rocky road.]

Monday, May 31, 2010

Bon mot for the week

"To gain that which is worth having, it may be necessary to lose everything else."





This seems a particularly appropriate thought to carry into this week, something to remember whenever you hear Chinese people (or foreign commentators on China) suggesting that they'd really rather have 'stability' and 'prosperity' in China than respect for humanity, accountable government, and the rule of law.

Friday, May 21, 2010

Two weeks to go....

...until the 21st anniversary of the grimmest - and most important - event in China's modern history, the entry of the PLA into Beijing to bring a violent end to the Tiananmen Square demonstrations.

The Lego 'Tank Man' above was one of the first of a daily series of images of Tiananmen '89 that Stuart over at Found In China has been running this year as a three-week memorial countdown to June 4th. It might seem rather frivolous and irreverent to render that iconic confrontation with a children's toy, but as I noted around this time last year, I don't think we should be too stuffy about this sort of thing - humour serves its purposes, offers us new perspectives on the most terrible events, and provides a kind of cathartic safety-valve for emotions that threaten to become too painful, overwhelming. I'm sure Stuart will include in his series many more pictures of the terror and carnage that erupted in this city on the night of June 3rd 1989 and continued over the following days (in the comments to one of these posts he provided a link to this particularly grisly collection of photographs on the Democratic China Blog II [one of those resources that had long been inaccessible to me here, until I got myself a proper VPN at the end of last year]); we need one or two 'lighter' moments to recover our spirits after horrors like those.




I have long been pondering the idea of creating a provocative modern artwork drawing on the iconography of the 'Tank Man', a sort of guerilla performance piece - perhaps doing something with toy tanks down on Tiananmen Square; or staging a mass lookalike march, with dozens of folks donning white shirts and dark slacks and unruly black wigs, and carrying shopping bags. I would have dearly loved to see someone try to emulate the 'Tank Man' during last year's pompous militaristic parade down Chang'an Avenue for the country's 60th anniversary celebrations, stepping into the road to disrupt that hideous procession of armoured vehicles - but any attempt to carry out such a stunt would, I'm sure, have got the perpetrators swiftly despatched to the gulag, if not to a firing squad. I've also thought about instigating a portrait series of leading 'dissident' figures of today posing as the 'Tank Man' - I think Ai WeiWei would be up for it, but I'm not sure how many others would dare such a provocation, or have the status to protect them from dire retribution.

The idea I like best, and keep returning to - perhaps something that could be done in Photoshop, without having to risk a live 'event' on Chang'an Avenue or the Square - is that of a 'Tank Man' facing down a line of radio-controlled toy tanks. It suggests (I hope - without dishonouring the extraordinary bravery of the original 'Tank Man') the comparative impotence of the regime, and the potency of individual acts of defiance. But then I thought an even more apt message might be to depict not just a reversal of the scale of the 'Tank Man' incident (the intimidating hugeness of the tank rendered small and harmless) but of the numbers too:
a column of 'Tank Men' stretching away into the distance, facing a single tank.

Back in '89 it seemed impossible that one man could halt an entire column of tanks driving down the road, but this unassuming hero proved otherwise. Today it seems impossible that the outdated and discredited Communist Party can cling to power in this country using the threat of force against its own people, yet - alas - they continue to prove otherwise. Back then, one man had the courage to stand up to this brutal regime; today, a nation of more than one billion people is too apathetic or too fearful to do so. It really wouldn't take very much to start changing things here, to start the long overdue dismantling of the one-party state. The balance of power is on the Chinese people's side now, if they did but recognise it.

Saturday, April 03, 2010

China and me (How it all began...)

Nearly a year ago, I wrote a lengthy post about my experiences on my first visit to mainland China - an extended holiday in the spring and early summer of 1994, mostly based in Wuhan, an industrial city on the Yangtze, slap bang in the middle of the country. That proved to be one of my most popular pieces ever on the blog, and it's still picking up the odd random drive-by from search engines or whatever today.

My fascination with China, though cemented on that trip, far predates it. My relationship with China stretches back through most of my lifetime. Chinese folks I meet are fond of asking the obvious question "Why did you come to China?", and I always struggle to give them a straightforward, easily-digestible answer. My reasons aren't very straightforward; the 'China bug' goes a long way back.

So, I have been meaning for nearly a year now to write a follow-up post on the origins of my interest in China. Here it is, at last.



I think perhaps I'll work backwards from 1994. The reason I was in China then was that I was visiting one of my best friends from university, who had been in the country for nearly four years and had recently married a Chinese girl. Oddly enough, our relationship had perhaps become even closer and more affectionate since our college days, and even during the period of our separation after he'd gone to China. He'd fallen into the habit of writing long letters to me fairly regularly (ah, the days before e-mail!), at least once every month or two, and sometimes twice a month; and I'd done my best to respond in kind, and to send him little 'care packages' from time to time, useful selections of newspaper and magazine cuttings he could use in his teaching, or books for his own pleasure (I like to think that I was one of the first people to introduce a copy of Chang Jung's Wild Swans [this edition] into the country!). That had built up into a substantial correspondence over four years. His letters, of course, with their snapshots of life in the Chinese countryside at a time when the great economic takeoff had barely started (on his first two-year tour of duty with VSO he had been posted to a teacher-training college in a small town out in the wilds of Hubei province; he was rewarded for his rare willingness to sign on for a second term with a job at a small university in the bustling - but still very primitive - metropolis of Wuhan), were far more interesting than my jaded accounts of my first teaching job at a small private school in the south-west of England.

That friendship had given me the specific motivation, the opportunity to visit China in person; but my attachment to the country had long preceded that. Indeed, I fancy I may have been at least partly responsible for my friend's choosing to go there. Partly - he doubtless had his own complex reasons for being drawn to the country. As an experimental first career out of university he had briefly been a member of the London Metropolitan Police Force, and his beat had often covered Chinatown: that had left some deep, though not always very positive, impressions of Chinese culture on him; and much of that experience he had passed on to me. From my side, the school where I was teaching had an unusually high proportion of Chinese students - some British Chinese, some from other Asian diaspora communities like Singapore and Malaysia, but the vast majority from Hong Kong (still at that time a British colony, but now moving towards the 'handover' back to the PRC). These - especially the Hong Kong students - felt a close attachment to China; but there was usually a strong dichotomy in their feelings: an effusive adoration of the country itself and its history, but a fierce dislike of the ruling Communist Party regime. That was a mixture of attitudes that chimed closely with my own inclinations. Spending so much time with these Chinese teenagers added a lot to my understanding of the country and the culture, and reinforced my longstanding interest, my desire to one day go there myself. And I wonder if some of my China obsession rubbed off on the friend who pre-empted me in moving there in the summer of 1990.

That was a particularly emotional time to be developing such a close interest in China. In the summer term at the end of my first year of teaching, the Tiananmen Square protests came along. My Chinese students and I watched the television coverage each day with a mixture of anxiety and exhilaration. Yes, the protests were naive, immature, unfocused, chaotic. But they were impressively non-violent, and this was developing into a mass movement on a quite staggering scale. There was something irresistibly charming about the innocence and optimism of those few weeks. We were beginning to hope that this might be a threshold moment in the development of China (and the other Communist countries), that the government could not possibly deny such a large-scale, nationwide outpouring of discontent, and would have to start accelerating the economic liberalisation and allying it at last also to a political liberalisation - the beginnings of some democratic representation, more meaningful constitutional guarantees of human rights, and the eventual dismantling of the one-party state. Oh yes, we were starting to have hopes: hopes that the more reasonable and far-sighted members of the CCP hierarchy like Zhao Ziyang and Bao Tong might prevail and start leading the country on a new path to the future; hopes that those kids on the Square would be singing the Internationale every year from then on to celebrate the breakthrough, the turning point in their country's modern history. How devastatingly those hopes were dashed. I wept as seldom before or since when I watched the news on June 4th. My Hong Kong Chinese students were incensed - spewing torrents of the most savage abuse at the hardliners like Li Peng, advocating armed resistance, hoping that the UK would renege on the Hong Kong handover. Yes, that was a very emotional time.

The bitter disillusionment of 1989 did not destroy my affection for China. Chinese citizens often struggle to distinguish their country from its government; for most laowai, this is a very elementary distinction - our attitude toward the country (and its people) has absolutely nothing to do with our opinion of its government. If anything, the 6/4 crackdown intensified my affection for the country: my long interest in and respect for its history and culture was now overlayed with feelings of profound sympathy and a furious rage against injustice. I wanted to see China recover from this nightmare, see its wounds heal, see it get back on a forward path. I wanted to see the government acknowledge its fault in having resorted to military force, and to apologise to its abused and betrayed people. And of course I wanted - still want - to see the 'mistake' righted, to see the reforms we hoped for in 1989 one day come to pass.

That wasn't my first disillusionment with China's government. I'd taken a close interest in Hong Kong for many years. In fact, for a while my first serious post-University career plan had been to sign up for a stint in the Royal Hong Kong Police (I'd seen an excellent documentary series about the force on BBC1 in the late '70s or early '80s: that had been another of the key formative influences in my increasing interest in China). Although I didn't necessarily oppose returning Hong Kong to Chinese rule, I was disturbed at how the Chinese had played hardball in the initial negotiations with the Thatcher government, and subsequently proven to be petulant, unreasonable, and untrustworthy in the discussions over the transitional arrangements. In the late '80s and early '90s it was difficult to be anything other than extremely anxious about the prospects for the people of Hong Kong retaining their personal and political freedoms under Communist rule. And I decided I didn't want to be involved in a law enforcement role out there during the difficult last few years before handover; I was worried that the job might become more and more about riot control rather than fighting crime.

The other main influence - cultural rather than political - on my 'China love affair' during my student days was the Chinese Arts Centre, a small shop on the Oxford High Street. It was a cornucopia of delightful oddities. Mostly, it was the usual run of mass-produced scroll paintings, cloissoné and lacquerware, faux Tang dynasty pottery horses and so on - but rather better quality than you typically see these days. However, it also carried some much more out-of-the ordinary stuff: old propaganda posters (some of them originals, I think) and Cultural Revolution memorabilia, and (somewhere, in one of my storage boxes back in the UK, I think I may still have this) a wonderful little early 1970s Mandarin phrasebook which included such useful expressions as "How many tractors does your factory produce each year?" It was run by one of those great English eccentrics, who, like me, had felt a strange attraction to China from an early age, and had become one of the first foreigners to start making regular visits there, even before 'reform and opening'. It vexes me that I can no longer remember his name. During my undergraduate days I bought nearly all of my birthday and Christmas presents for my family there, and would drop in for a chat with the old chap once every week or two. Alas, both he and his wonderful little shop are long passed on now.

Even the marvellous Chinese Arts Centre, though, was not wooing me for the first time; it was working on an established propensity. As so often with me, I think cinema was one of the earliest and most powerful influences leading me down this path. During my 1970s childhood The Sand Pebbles, the Steve McQueen adventure story about an American gunboat running into trouble on the Yangtze in the 1920s, seemed to be shown on ITV at least once a year; and I watched it every time, absolutely loved it. There were other films set in China that enraptured me too - Yangtse Incident, The Inn Of The Sixth Happiness, and 55 Days At Peking - but it was The Sand Pebbles that most got under my skin. None of these were wholly positive portraits of the country, yet somehow I latched on to the positive more than the negative. There were many films about India I saw at the same time - most notably North West Frontier, a marvellous train film starring Kenneth More - which excited my young imagination as much if not more, yet they never inspired me to want to visit the country: the impression they left on balance was of too much heat and dust and squalor and violence. My impressions of China - despite the cruelty, anarchy and xenophobia so prominent in those films - were primarily of beauty, mystery, exoticism, vibrancy.... well, I don't know quite what it was, but it was something. From the time I was about 8 or 10, I just knew that China was a place I wanted to see with my own eyes.


Ah, but there was one more influence even earlier than those favourite childhood films. When I was still in Primary School, only about 7 or 8, we had a teacher who would occasionally take the class to the television room - just to give himself a break for 40 or 50 minutes. He didn't do it on a regular basis, to let us watch a complete series of programmes from the BBC Schools service. He didn't even consult the schedules to find something appropriate to our age range. He just took us to watch whatever might happen to be on, so that he could enjoy a little respite of peace and quiet. Some of the programmes, perhaps most of them, were decidedly age-inappropriate: I remember being fascinated, baffled, and embarrassed in roughly equal measures by a very technical biology programme about sex which was surely intended for pupils at least 6 years older than us. One of these inappropriate TV 'treats' that resonated even more strongly in my memory, though, than these models and animations of human genitalia was an episode from a series on 20th century history - the one about Mao and the Long March. I was blown away. I had no idea who this guy was, but I could sense his charisma from the grainy old black-and-white footage; and I knew that his followers had done something amazing, something impossible, but I didn't understand why. I think that's where it all began. I wanted to know WHY. I wanted to understand what this event signified, why these people had done it, how this leader had inspired them. Soon afterwards I began reading everything I could find about China. I haven't stopped since.

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Do you find me WISIBLE?

Er, yes.
 
I had been anxious for the past few weeks that today's Big Parade would be a rather sinister and depressing affair, but..... well, it was so riotously over-the-top, so unself-consciously kitsch, so downright camp at times, that it was impossible to take it seriously.  The only appropriate response was to smirk and chortle.
 
Honestly, those soldiers strutting primly by with that - somehow rather mincing - attenuated goose-step.... I'm sure I've seen some of those boys down at Destination (Beijing's most famous gay bar - I wonder if that's Google-able?).  My buddy The Choirboy had no hesitation in pronouncing this "the gayest parade I've ever seen" (I would like to think he meant it as a compliment, at least in a roundabout way).  Confirmation of this implicit theme of celebrating China's homosexuality seemed to come near the end when one of the English-language announcers (both of whom delivered their dire script in a permanently perplexed monotone which seemed to suggest that they were having to sight-read it [very possible - 'state secrets', and all that!] and/or that they couldn't believe what they were being asked to say) referred to "The Tiananmen Gay Towers" (ah, final consonants - hours of fun!).  And did you notice the big rainbow picture at the north end of T square?  Yep, I think one of the designers of this spectacle managed to smuggle in a HUGE gay sub-text, which entirely passed over the heads of the glibly smiling septuagenarians on the rostrum.
 
Just about the final words of the TV commentary were "another important event that happened on Tiananmen Square".  Oh dear.  Of course, the most important event that's happened there still finds no place in public discourse in this country.  Until it does, it will be impossible to take anything the CCP says or does seriously.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

The sound of rattling sabres

Last week, on my way out to visit my friend Nick's photo exhibition, I ran afoul of the tanks. A double column of light tanks and self-propelled guns was waiting to roll into town from the east, and almost all major roads for half a mile or so in all directions around them were blocked off. Even the footpaths alongside Tonghui Creek were closed (since they passed under the road where the column was being held, awaiting its move order), so thousands of pedestrians were being forced to walk along the elevated Jingtong Expressway, the only thoroughfare still open. Every weekend, you see, from late August until the grand 60th anniversary of the PRC on 1st October, there are full-scale rehearsals of the planned festivities around Tiananmen Square. The centrepiece of those festivities is going to be a massive parade of military hardware (How quaint! Isn't that SO Cold War?!) down the central artery of Chang'an Avenue. Of course, this causes huge disruption of traffic across the whole city for 48 hours at a time. But it's all worth it. Oh yes.

No, it isn't. How I wish a new 'Tank Man' would bravely step into the middle of the road and say, "Enough of this foolishness. Go back to your barracks, and stay there."


Now, I admit I can't quite shake off my schoolboy fascination with the paraphernalia of warfare, and part of me thinks it's quite cool to be able to see this sort of equipment up close. A much larger part of me, though, is ashamed of such trivial pleasures, and feels a much stronger and more profound sense of discomfort when confronted with this spectacle: there is something incongruous, indeed downright sinister, about encountering troops and tanks in the streets of a city. I think this would be true anywhere in the world; but it is especially so here in a city still haunted by the traumatic memories of the imposition of martial law 20 years ago.

Inevitably, this has become a favourite talking point for me over the past couple of weeks, both in private conversations and in the weekly discussion group I'm running with some Chinese lawyers.

I find it very disheartening that none of the Chinese I've broached the subject with so far seems to think there is anything untoward about any of this. Indeed, they don't seem to have even any awareness of the concept of 'militarism'. They don't see this sort of posturing as immature, or provocative. They don't see it as the kind of thing that can lead to wars. I guess they don't have any familiarity with the arms races in Europe - and, in particular, the rise, and then the resurgence of aggressive nationalism in Germany - which precipitated the two World Wars.

So, I move on to try to consider the semiotics of this sort of event from first principles: what exactly is the thinking behind this? what sort of signals is it intended to send out? aren't you at all concerned how negatively this is likely to be viewed in most other countries around the world? how do the Chinese themselves interpret its message?


Well, the Chinese perception of this HUGE display of military power planned for the October 1st celebrations seems to be (and here I am shamelessly recycling a comment I contributed [or tried to contribute - I'm still being plagued by Internet glitches!] to an interesting thread that's been evolving this week on Stuart's Found In China blog) that it is necessary and justified, to intimidate China's enemies.

Yep, they don't even say "potential enemies" there, just "enemies". When challenged as to who those enemies might be, they start off with the USA and the UK (which seems to be more about lingering resentments of the "century of humiliation", and envy of global hegemony rather than any, you know, realistic military threat). When you point out that the USA and the UK have neither the desire nor the capability to fight a land war against China, they reconsider for a moment, and then suggest India, Russia, and Japan. Actual neighbours. That's a lot more worrying. But when you press them a little further, and ask, "Come on, really, who might you ever use these weapons against? Who are you actually trying to intimidate?" Why, then they say: Xinjiang, Tibet, and Taiwan.

It's not just swaggering militarism. It's preparation for civil war.

That's why I feel so uncomfortable with it.


And it makes a mess of the tarmac.

Saturday, June 13, 2009

List of the Month - Excuses....

..... for not going down to Tiananmen Square on the 3rd or the 4th.


I had been planning to, but it didn't quite happen. Amongst the reasons why:


1) Lack of time, energy
I've been working like a dog for the past few weeks, almost literally from dawn to dusk on many days. Trying to fit in an expedition down to the Square as well was a pretty major undertaking.

2) The hours of daylight
The time I would really have wanted to go would have been in the early hours of the morning - partly because that's when the clearing of the Square happened; partly because (as Stuart slyly suggested a couple of weeks ago) it would have been nice to get a photograph of the national flag at half-mast over the Square during the dawn flag-raising ceremony. Not much chance of that happening in my present state of exhaustion, alas. And sun-up is around 4.40am - ouch! The flag-lowering at dusk was a tempting alternative - but that happens at around 7.40pm, and I didn't find that timing convenient for me either on that day.

3) Stiff legs
I went for my first run in about three months on the afternoon of June 3rd. It had been my intention to wander out to Muxidi in the evening, to see if there might be some kind of low-key commemoration going on, and perhaps to light a candle myself. After the run, I was too creaky and enfeebled to contemplate it any more, and instead retired to bed early. [Muxidi is a residential neighbourhood about 5 miles or so west of Tiananmen, and was the scene of probably the largest single shooting incident of the crackdown - a massacre that even the Chinese government is unable to deny or conceal. At around 10.30pm on June 3rd troops started firing sustained volleys into the crowds attempting to block their progress to the Square - and fired, seemingly randomly, into surrounding buildings too - killing nearly 200 people. Much of the area is relatively unchanged, and I imagine that quite a number of the residents of 20 years ago are still living there - and would have been the people mostly likely to mark the anniversary in some small way. I didn't hear of any kind of public demonstration, though; whatever commemorations there were, they were very private and discreet.]

4) Discouraging weather
Just as I was about to head out on the late afternoon/early evening of the 4th, the sky suddenly clouded over and it began to rain. I hadn't really left myself quite enough time to get there before sundown anyway (I'd been planning to walk - fearing likely police checks at the Tiananmen Square subway stations).

5) I am a coward
I'm afraid I did also allow myself to be deterred somewhat by misgivings about the likely level of security around the Square. The number of police, secret police, and army (many of them in plain clothes) was, of course, much increased over the usual - overkill, oppressive - levels. And there were numerous reports of strict ID checks all around the area, and of some foreigners being denied access to the Square (although I also heard of a number of people getting on to the Square without any hassle at all; it may have been that only known journalists, or people who looked like they might be journalists because they were carrying nice cameras, were getting such bothersome attention). I'd only just got my new visa back, and hadn't yet managed to re-register my residence with my local police station: I just didn't fancy taking the chance - even a very slim chance - that this 'irregularity' might be exploited to make trouble for me.

6) I was too emotional
I often get pretty choked up visiting the Square. I have other reasons of my own for being especially emotionally brittle in the month of June. And the heightened emotions surrounding this momentous 20th anniversary have left me a bit of a basket-case over the past couple of weeks. I didn't want to be seen blubbing in public. And I didn't want to risk an attack of the red mist, getting myself into a fight with one of the plain-clothes goon squadders.

7) Despair
I found the certainty that there would be nothing to see down there too goddamned depressing for words. The Chinese people today are too ignorant of what happened, or too complacent in their slowly growing prosperity, or just too damned cowed and apathetic to raise any kind of protest about the events of 1989. And the few, the tiny handful that might have wished to do something will have been efficaciously discouraged by the knowledge that scores of goons with truncheons would have been all over them as soon as they raised a cigarette-lighter to their candles. The bad guys won 20 years ago. And they're still winning today. I hate that. It makes me sick to my stomach.

8) Not wanting to be a 'tourist'
I get the impression from friends, from other China blogs that - apart from the security forces and a few Chinese tour groups - just about the only people down at the Square last Thursday, certainly the only people there with any interest in the anniversary, were foreigners. This is primarily the Chinese people's trauma, not ours; and there is a danger of our taking too prurient an interest in it, of appropriating their grief as our own. God knows, I am often guilty of this myself - but on this day I didn't want to be a gawker.


I have been to the Square since (and got very emotional). I will go there again. And I will write many more posts about the 'crackdown', its aftermath, and its continuing significance for us today. But I didn't visit the Square on the 3rd or 4th this year; and I don't feel too regretful or guilty about that. I think I made the right choice - even if, at the time, I wasn't fully conscious of the factors shaping my decision.


Friday, June 12, 2009

Tiananmen anniversary roundup

I was 'away' (over-emotional and overworked) for slightly more than the week I'd planned.... and this weekend isn't looking auspicious for a resumption of blogging either.

To keep you stimulated, here's a selection of the most interesting things I read related to the Tiananmen anniversary during the last week or so.

I'd already mentioned Philip Cunningham's Tiananmen Moon blog (a plug for a book of the same name [astonishingly enough, that link is not currently blocked in China!]). He seems to have closed it now, but the final two posts were long excerpts from his personal experience of June 3rd and June 4th in Beijing.

More intriguing eye-witness recollections were offered by Don Tai, a Chinese (I assume: he doesn't offer much biographical detail on his blog) Canadian who happened to be attending a Beijing university as an overseas student in 1989 (he has stopped in here on Froogville once or twice with a comment). This post about his experiences visiting a Chinese friend who lived near Tiananmen Square "the morning after" is particularly wrenching.

The New York Times' 'Lens' photojournalism blog carried a piece on the 3rd recounting the stories of the four press photographers who captured pictures of the 'Tank Man' - which led to the emergence the next day of an additional, previously unpublished shot taken by AP journalist Terril Jones. Unlike the more familiar views of the incident taken from the elevated vantage points of windows and balconies in the Beijing Hotel a few hundred yards to the east of Tiananmen Square, this picture is taken at street level. It seems a random, unremarkable snapshot of chaos and terror: a few people running or cycling away from the approaching armoured column (apparently a group of APCs had rolled through shortly beforehand, with soldiers on the back of them firing into the air to try to disperse the groups of onlookers along the side of the road).... but then, suddenly, you notice - in the background, in the upper left corner of the frame - the familiar figure of the 'Tank Man' taking position in the middle of a pedestrian crossing, getting ready to play his historic game of 'chicken' with the lead tank. Curiously, there's no reference to this grainy black-and-white long shot that I dug up for my 6/4 post on Froogville last year; I wonder who took this.
The Boston Globe's June 5th article carried a lot of large photos related to Tiananmen (so large, unfortunately, that they won't all load very readily - at least, not if you're having to use Tor - but be patient: they're worth it), some taken at the time (including a large version of that previously unknown street-level 'Tank Man' photo), some today (showing the enhanced police/military presence there this year to discourage any acts of commemoration or other potential embarrassments). I found the most moving ones to be those of this year's candelit mass vigil in Hong Kong's Victoria Park (150,000 people - according to most non-CCP sources - and you can readily believe it when you see photos like this one).
I also found interesting this June 2nd article from the UK's Guardian by Chinese author Ma Jian about how the government here is suppressing the memory of the 6/4 crackdown. It's a much better piece of writing than his horribly over-long and almost unreadable novel about these events, Beijing Coma - although a little too polemical at times for its own good (his allegation that the government knew of the melamine milk-doping scandal ahead of the Olympics but suppressed the news is plausible but, I fear, unprovable; and his suggestion that the ice lollies he fed to his daughter when visiting here last summer were all melamine-tainted is clearly a cheap shot, an over-emotionalism that does a disservice to the rest of the piece).

Another major Chinese writer, Yu Hua, had this op-ed piece in the New York Times at the end of May, titled 'China's forgotten revolution', a bitter observation on how the CCP has killed the idea of 'the people' in China. Do take a look, if you haven't already.

For the sake of "balance", check out how Chinese state media discuss these events. Well, actually, the mainstream media here discuss it little or not at all. But this paper, Global Times, is a new English-language venture, aimed at delivering the CCP 'message' a little more palatably and effectively to international audiences - so they felt (quite rightly) that they couldn't completely ignore the anniversary and retain any credibility with their target readership. It starts off slightly promisingly, with references to the increased police presence on the Square, the blocking of certain websites, and "scholars, officials, and businessmen declin[ing] interviews" with the paper. But then it quickly slides into the standard guff about how no-one cares any more because of 'the economic miracle' (with a sly reference or two to "the burnt bodies of soldiers" being one interviewee's only childhood recollection of the event). Credibility still not very high, I'm afraid, boys. But credit for daring to mention "the June 4th incident" at all; it's usually completely taboo in the Chinese media.

I was relieved to see that Hillary Clinton, after hitting the 'mute' button on human rights issues rather exaggeratedly when she paid her first visit to China a few months ago, issued a more appropriately forceful statement ahead of the 6/4 anniversary:
"A China that has made enormous progress economically, and that is emerging to take its rightful place in global leadership, should examine openly the darker events of its past and provide a public accounting of those killed, detained or missing, both to learn and to heal."
Hear, hear.

And finally, here's an interview with Guernica given by Wu'er Kaixi, one of the main student leaders of the '89 protest movement, now living in exile in Taiwan (his parents are refused permission to leave the mainland, so haven't seen him in person in over 20 years; at least in recent years Skype has enabled them to start keeping in touch by videophone).

There have been a lot of very moving words and images out there this past two weeks. And I hope this flood of remembrance and respect is going to continue for a good long time yet - until the Chinese leadership (and the majority of the Chinese people) start remembering too.

A week on haiku

Tears for the blood shed;
Tears for lost hope, lost chances;
Tears for all the lies.


No, a week - 9 days - on, I'm still not feeling much less sad and angry about that anniversary.


Wednesday, June 03, 2009

A week for silent reflection

The dismal anniversary is upon us, and that seems like a reasonable cue to take a little break from blogging for a while. I get too darned emotional about these events, and if I wrote about nothing else for the next week or more, I daresay everyone would get rather weary of it. I'm sure I'll have at least a few more TAM posts in me at some point, but for now I think this sombre milestone would be better commemorated by a week of respectful silence.

There are lots of people out there writing better stuff about it than me, anyway. Long-time China hand Philip Cunningham, for example, has been providing a fascinating day-by-day recap of the 1989 events as he experienced them on his blog Tiananmen Moon (though I think he's not much of a writer, and in later life he appears to have become in some ways a bit of a CCP apologist, or at any rate an over-compensatory USA-basher, he was unquestionably here and in the thick of things when it all went down 20 years ago) - a teaser for his just-published book of the same name.

Expect me to be back around the middle of next week (if I don't manage to get myself arrested /deported in the next 24 hours or so).


And if you are going out in Beijing, or anywhere in China, tonight or tomorrow - Wear White.
[It is the Chinese colour of mourning, and I gather a few of the still active leaders of the '89 movement have been advocating this as a sign of respect - perhaps one of the few that people might be able to get away with here. It will be difficult to tell how many people are intentionally making such a statement of support, since the weather is very warm and lots of people are wearing white for comfort anyway, but..... we'll see.]

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Why it matters

I suggested the other day that this week's 20th anniversary of the suppression of the Tiananmen protests in Beijing is an extremely important event. I also noted with regret that this importance seems to pass many Chinese by. (Well, not just the Chinese. Many foreigners younger than 30 or 35 are also sadly ignorant of what happened then.)

I believe it's important because it is one of the gravest crimes committed by the Chinese Communist Party against the Chinese people. (And, oh, sure, the crimes of the Mao era were on a far more massive scale; but the night of June 3rd/4th achieved a unique resonance because it was seen live on television all around the world.)

Indeed, it is one of the gravest crimes that can be committed by any government against its people. It breached the fundamental covenant on which all government is based (not all nations are fortunate enough to have this covenant hardwired into their constitutions, but even the harshest dictatorships have to acknowledge it to some degree and at least pay lip service to it most of the time): that the duty of government is to serve the people, protect the people, respect the people (and that the function of the armed forces is to defend the people, not to kill them).

I believe it continues to be important because on that night the CCP fatally compromised its legitimacy as the ruling body in China - it revealed itself as an institution concerned only with perpetuating its own grip on power, demonstrated that it had absolutely no respect for law or for humanity. I don't think it has ever really regained that legitimacy, restored its mandate to govern. (I find there is a strange doublethink in most of the Chinese I know: they quite happily tolerate the continued rule of the CCP because they're doing an OK job of managing the economy [and there is no available alternative]; and yet at the same time many of them express the most withering contempt for the Party.)

It is also important for China's position on the world stage. On that night, China fatally compromised its image in the eyes of every other nation on the planet. It is impossible to trust or respect a nation which can do that to its own people. Now, when China protests its non-aggressive intentions in its foreign policy towards its neighbours, when it touts itself as a "responsible stakeholder" in the international arena, when it makes a claim to leadership in tackling pollution or global warming - nobody takes her very seriously. I'm sorry to say that I don't think anybody really trusts China. China has no credibility - certainly not as a source of any kind of moral leadership in world affairs. China sacrificed that credibility 20 years ago this week, and has never yet come close to winning it back.

This is why, I believe, this anniversary is so important - for the Chinese Communist Party, for the Chinese people, and for the world at large.

Yes, it was "all a long time ago", and China as a country has made unimaginable advances in the intervening years. The tragedy is that the CCP does not seem to have made such progress: it is still locked in a Cold War mindset of absolute authoritarianism - all criticism must be stifled, any error must be denied. Neither the Party nor the country nor the Chinese people will truly be able to move forward until they stop hiding from their recent history. It is time to start acknowledging - and apologising for - what happened in 1989. I believe such a process would benefit the CCP more than anyone else. I do not think that a government or a country that is afraid of truth can sustain itself for very long.



**************

And on a related note, Richard Burger over at the Peking Duck observed last week that even the Chinese who know of the "Tank Man" incident are mostly rather unmoved by it, and suggested that the Chinese conception of a 'hero' is conditioned by the ideal of maintaining a "constructive harmony", that the terrible fear of "instability" makes them unreceptive to the iconography of the "lone rebel" challenging the authority of the government. I think there's a lot of truth in that assessment, but I think it's a very great pity - and testimony to the overwhelming power of the state propaganda here which has again and again lauded 'harmony' as the greatest, just about the only 'good'.

I also think it's a tragically misguided interpretation of what that man and that photograph represent. It was the presence of tanks on the streets that was truly 'destabilising', a violation of the proper 'orderliness' of society - not the ordinary citizen stepping forward to express his disapproval of this. It was the use of military force (and the fact that this use of force was so inept, so uncontrolled) that shattered the "constructive harmony" of the Chinese nation, and drove a wedge between its people and its government. The "Tank Man", with his peaceful and reasoned argument that this outrage should stop, was the one trying to restore harmony - and should thus be applauded for his heroism within the Chinese conception of performing a service to society, as well as within the more Western conception of embodying individualistic idealism and courage. (And let us not forget, either, that the tank driver who declined to run him over - at who knows what cost to himself? - was another hero that day. Many other members of the occupying forces did not show such restraint, such humanity.)


The extraordinary power of this image lies in the contrast of scale - a tiny human figure facing down the massive tank, a whole column of tanks stretching far into the distance - and in the terrifying juxtaposition of the fragility of human flesh and invulnerable, unforgiving metal. A further important resonance comes from the fact that this appeared to be not a premeditated act of defiance, but a purely spontaneous gesture - an ordinary citizen so appalled by what his government was doing that he stepped into the middle of the road and cried, "Enough!" I can't understand how anyone - particularly any citizen of China - can be unmoved by this.

It is another depressing example of the pervasiveness and effectiveness of the propaganda and censorship here that this photograph is so little recognised; and that even when it is, its symbolism is unappreciated. Around the rest of the world, this has become one of the most iconic images of the 20th Century - it has become an inspiration to millions of people battling against injustice, encouraging them to believe that even the most seemingly insuperable odds can eventually be overcome, and that one man can make a difference. Even if the "Tank Man" didn't make much of a difference or for very long at the time, that inspirational legacy will bear fruit all over the world and will be remembered for centuries to come - long after the Chinese Communist Party has withered and died.