I've just finished another of those brain-mulchingly tedious editing jobs on a foreign policy paper.
The English was a lot less awful than in the last few of these I've done over the past week, and the subject matter - the future of NATO - was intermittently modestly interesting.
No, today's humdinger of crapness was saved for a footnote near the end. The citation this author gave as the basis for his comments on American military spending was...... Wikipedia!
You might accept this kind of slovenliness from a high school student, or maybe even a first-year undergraduate.... but from a Doctor of International Relations??!!
1 comment:
The doc should consider himself lucky Wikipedia wasn't behind the GFW.
Post a Comment